The clearest current evidence is for osteoarthritis and joint pain. Curcumin also looks probably helpful for metabolic markers, lipid effects, fatty liver (NAFLD) or liver health, and chemotherapy-side-effect support, but the broad anti-inflammatory and mood-marketing picture is more mixed under the current grading system than the old A-heavy page implied. Formulation still matters a lot: enhanced-bioavailability products and piperine combinations drive many of the stronger trials.
Each row is a different health effect. A means the support looks strongest, B likely helpful, C mixed or modest, and — not enough human evidence yet.
Papers are individual studies. Research reviews summarize evidence from multiple studies, such as systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Dose, form and timing based on trials in the database.
Products that pass third-party quality testing.
Product quality data coming soon
Product recommendations are being built from USP Verified, NSF Certified, and Labdoor test data. Products will only appear here after the supplement itself clears the evidence bar above — and only if the product passes third-party purity testing.
Grades come from 199 unique research papers indexed from PubMed — including 80 meta-analyses, 34 systematic reviews, and 80 randomized trials. Curcumin's evidence base is unusually rich in formulation comparisons: enhanced-bioavailability products (Meriva, Theracurmin, BCM-95) and curcumin+piperine combinations dominate positive trials, while turmeric powder trials are flagged low-confidence when the curcumin content is unclear (typical turmeric is ~3% curcumin). The depression and ulcerative colitis outcomes have ≥10 papers each but most fail the quality filter — small samples, polyherbal designs, or unspecified formulations — so they sit under "common perception, missing data" until cleaner trials accumulate. Each supplement is graded by health effect using a certainty × effect matrix applied across PubMed evidence per health effect. Cochrane reviews and high-quality systematic reviews carry the most weight. From abstract-only data, "high certainty" is rare — most A grades come from moderate certainty plus consistent meaningful-positive evidence. See Methodology for full detail.
Read the full methodology → · Download all 199 citations (PDF)